Letter to my stupid ex-lawyer Janet
Guess she don't want to practice law no more😆 her & Laura con-not-yet-over til you elect ME for DISTRICT ATTORNEY instead! T R I S T A WRITE ME IN FOR SHERIFF TOO! Y'ALL DESERVE BETTER 💕
PS I never said the judge was corrupt I don't know why you keep trying to insinuate I said he was corrupt. I never said he was corrupt.
SHAME ON YOU
I'm applying to law school and hold advanced degrees from Oxford and Berkeley what nonsense are you talking about, if I understand the basic legal concepts of this case?
Hope you lose your law license over initiating these ridiculous and obviously more malicious prosecution from the courts, Rule 11 proceedings after they already kidnapped me once in a title 36 operation which is subject of not one but two Federal subsection 1983 lawsuits CV-23-00524-TUC-JCH & CV-23-00524-TUC-JCH
and prosecutors and cops which you are obviously in their back pocket to do something so disgraceful to somebody else!
It's not delusional in the least LOL to say that you are obviously collaborating with them to put me away for 15 months in a psych ward, heavily drugged up!
Bet you would really just love that huh you & the cops & the county.
Y'all need to lose your jobs 😁
It's not paranoia if it's based on fact!
One of my favorite mottos: only the paranoid survive!
Y'all are very vicious, and I hope you enjoy the one-star review I wrote on Google for ya LOL totally deserve it.
And I hope you enjoyed that second and revised complaint against you with the Arizona State Bar Association!
You were supposed to file a motion based on the evidence that I sent you! I showed you a veteran's expert video testimony of my false arrest at 8:37 in the morning but not "after noon" as the cops falsely claimed in their false reports; and false reporting is a crime I don't know if you knew that janet? ARS 132907.01
THE COPS GOT CAUGHT TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE BY ME! TRISTA-4-SHERIFF 🐎
They effed up, we are just peaceful nature-loving American citizens with clean records. Guess that never occurred to you as yet another way you could have filed a motion to dismiss these ridiculous charges.
I gave you the evidence and you filed to have me locked up in the loony bin for 15 months!
I should sue YOU for $100 million, depriving me of my constitutional rights to Fair counsel as well as my freedom! Maybe I should sue you for the amount they would have charged me if they put me away for 15 months because I would have to pay for it my own chemical incarceration Janet!
Yeah I understand the malicious charges against me all too well! I'm an Oxford and Berkeley scholar duh 🙄
You just became part of the defamation and smear campaign that for some people reason y'all are trying to wage against innocent people and are heartless basically! You don't care about the animals this is all about the animals, Janet! They were cruelly and unnecessarily taken away from me and my veteran friend thank God he was a witness that day! Because otherwise y'all would have disappeared me I'm sure.
PS unfortunately for you, I'm perfectly healthy! LOL that's why they let me out in record time under 24 hours the last time Laura conover's office and her criminals with badges title 36'd me! October 30th subject of a federal lawsuit.
That is just one of the many grounds that if you were a competent lawyer who took her job seriously you would have tried something! You lied to me and said that you would file a motion, janet.
You refused to do your due diligence as my public pretender and file ANYTHING!!! to dismiss these outrageous and defamatory, ridiculous case.
charging me for neglecting to bring my dog to the vet when he was already at the vet!?
PRIMA FASCIA PROSECUTORS HAVE NO CASE.
VETERINARIAN DID NOT REPORT ME FOR ANY NEGLECT OR WRONGDOING 🙄
WHAT ABOUT THE RECEIPTS?
How about the fact that I submitted all the receipts, in exhibits. The veterinarian at VCA was the second veterinarian I submitted receipts of Hank's care with the first veterinarian and cancer test results and receipt of payment of the vet Inez Gonzalez. Nothing works with you guys!
Maybe ya'll need to have your head examined 😆
so if you were worth your weight in salt as a lawyer you would have done what we agreed to do and filed a motion to drop these ridiculous frivolous meritless baseless and obviously malicious charges against me... and a desert Storm veteran! SHAME
I have to report this to the veterans administration y'all have been persecuting and traumatizing , trying to traumatize my veteran friend and I object to the cruel treatment from taking away his therapy dog, cookie. Absolutely disgusting conduct and treatment of a veteran by the court system here. Just sayin!
Guess you don't want to practice law anymore.
You didn't do what we agreed and so therefore you deprive me a fair counsel which is my right; and a fair trial. You are perfect example of a public pretender, pretending to defend people go retire, Janet 😆
You should be ashamed of yourself but I know you're not
Trista Tramposch di Genova
MSt, Oxford University
Okay so I'm eccentric but since when is that a f* crime
Laura conover's office need to drop these malicious charges or she's going to lose her f* license to practice law because she has been defrauding taxpayers by persecuting and prosecuting innocent people like me and a desert Storm veteran; moreover due to her machinations nearly 200 of my animals have been in locked up by the county for the past year!
JUSTICE FOR MY ANIMALS ⚖️
gofund me/10543a02
LAURA WHEN IS THE CON GOING TO BE OVER?
District attorney Laura Conover wants to lock me up in a psych ward 15 months even though there's nothing wrong with me.
Monday September 9th 9:00 a.m. PLEASE BE THERE
I'm filing 1 billion dollar malicious prosecution lawsuit against Pima County district attorney Laura conover's office...
And running against her!
CONOVER IS UNFIT AND I CALL FOR HER TO DROP OUT OF THE RACE
WRITE ME IN INSTEAD T R I S T A YOU CAN TRUST TRISTA
LAURA WHEN IS THE CON GOING TO BE OVER
Fighting for my freedom, & thought of my pets, who were cruelly taken away August 30th 2023
PC Pima County Sheriffs & Pima Animal Care center framed and defamed me for animal cruelty! I'm suing them for 1 billion apiece: criminal misconduct, defamation and of my character and Sterling reputation and approximately 200 counts of animal cruelty which is a f* crime ARS 13 2019
Questions? Trista Tramposch di Genova: tristasheriff@gmail.com
MST, Oxford University
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA
State of Arizona,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Trista Tramposch,
Defendant.Case No.: CV-23-003942-MI
Case No.: CR20242337-001
MOTION FOR RECUSAL OF JUDGE HOWARD FELL
(Pursuant to Rule 10.1 of the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure)
COMES NOW, the Defendant, Trista Tramposch, in propria persona, and respectfully moves this Honorable Court for an order recusing Judge Howard Fell from presiding over this case.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Defendant, Trista Tramposch, is currently involved in criminal proceedings in the above-captioned case.The Defendant is also the plaintiff in two federal lawsuits (Case Numbers: CV-2300525-TUC-JCH and CV-2300524-TUC-JCH), both of which involve claims of excessive force and other civil rights violations against officers connected to the events leading to the current charges.
Judge Howard Fell issued a search warrant that led to a raid on the Defendant’s home, a central issue in the aforementioned federal lawsuits.
II. GROUNDS FOR RECUSAL
Conflict of Interest: Judge Howard Fell is the subject of a formal complaint submitted by the Defendant to the Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct. The complaint specifically addresses Judge Fell’s role in approving the blanket search warrant that resulted in the raid on the Defendant's home—actions that are now central to two federal lawsuits.
Appearance of Impropriety: Judge Fell’s involvement in this case creates an appearance of impropriety and bias, particularly because his actions are directly tied to the Defendant’s federal lawsuits. This undermines the Defendant's right to a fair and impartial trial.
Rule 10.1, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure: Under Rule 10.1, a judge should be recused if their impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
Given Judge Fell’s involvement in approving the search warrant and the subsequent events, there is a reasonable basis to question his impartiality in this case.
III. SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS AGAINST JUDGE FELL
Improper Approval of Search Warrant: Judge Fell is accused of "rubber-stamping" a blanket search warrant without sufficient scrutiny. The warrant lacked a proper seal and did not provide clear reasons for authorizing the search, especially considering that the veterinarian did not report any neglect, and other reports were from an individual making multiple frantic calls from Phoenix. These reports should be deemed hearsay and unreliable.
Consequences of the Warrant: The improper issuance of the search warrant led to an invasive raid on the Defendant’s home, the cruel and unnecessary seizure of the Defendant’s animals, and the alleged fabrication of evidence by the officers involved. These actions have caused significant harm to the Defendant and have prejudiced the Defendant’s ability to receive a fair trial.
IV. OBJECTIONS TO CURRENT RULE 11 PROCEEDINGS
The Defendant objects to the Rule 11 proceedings initiated by my public defender Janet a l t s c h u l e r, who I fired for depriving me of my right to Fair council and filing a motion to dismiss these obviously frivolous and malicious charges.
I also object to the ground for malpractice that is the mental rule 11 mental evaluation by Dr. Barry Morenz, who failed to apply the proper criteria in assessing the Defendant's ability to understand the charges and whether the Defendant poses a harm to herself or others.
The Defendant asserts that she fully understands the charges and does not pose a danger, rendering the Rule 11 proceedings yet another instance of malicious prosecution.
The Defendant maintains that the charges are baseless, particularly those concerning the Defendant’s dog Hank. There is no crime in taking a dog to the vet out of concern for its well-being. The prosecution has failed to provide any evidence of criminal negligence, making the charges frivolous and unfounded.
V. NOTICE TO THE COURT
The Defendant has informed the Court that she has terminated the services of her public defender, Janet Altschuler, by text message and over the telephone. The Defendant now represents herself pro se but may retain private counsel shortly.
The Defendant respectfully suggests that rather than reassigning the case to a new judge, the case should be returned to continue before Judge Kendrick Wilson in the animal courts, if necessary, for trial, and to see my previously filed motions to dismiss all charges with prejudice, so as to prevent further harassment by law enforcement in this town.
VI. ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND
The Defendant holds several advanced degrees from Oxford University, where she served as a psychology tutor. These are factual statements, not grandiose claims, and should not be misconstrued as delusional.
The Defendant has previously filed to run for President of the United States, which underscores the actual realization, and taking concrete steps towards achieving her political ambitions
. The Defendant objects to any insinuations that these ambitions are grounds for questioning her mental state or for the initiation of Rule 11 proceedings.
The Defendant has no history of mental illness. On the contrary, she is an award-winning researcher in trauma counseling for refugees, with experience working at the U.S. State Department. The Defendant and her veteran friend, who has also been maliciously prosecuted, have clean records. The Defendant asserts that the continued prosecution is an abuse of public trust and calls for the charges to be dropped.
VII. CONCLUSION
Given the above reasons, the Defendant respectfully requests that:Judge Howard Fell be recused from further participation in this case due to the conflict of interest and appearance of bias.
The case be reassigned to another judge with no prior involvement or conflict of interest related to the events in question, or returned to Judge Kendrick Wilson in the animal courts.
The Court dismiss the charges due to a lack of evidence and the continued violation of the Defendant's constitutional rights, and out of compassionate concern for the poor animals who have been torn from their peaceful happy home for a year now, without reason.
VIII. DEMAND FOR RELIEF
In addition to the above, the Defendant demands the immediate return of all seized animals, particularly the service dog Dr. Baker, citing the Americans with Disabilities Act and ARS 13-2910. The Defendant also demands the dismissal of all charges due to the lack of evidence and the violation of her rights, along with $300 million in damages for the malicious prosecution and abuse of public trust.Respectfully submitted,
Trista Tramposch
Defendant, Pro Se
MSt, Oxford University
#bresnik #Politics #DavidPakman #abc15 #Arizona #ACLU #mentalhealth #azcentral #tucsonsentienel #jimnintzel koldnews #trending #news #arizonalife #tucson #tucsonarizona #pimadems #foxphoeni
x